ROAS Attribution

Your ROAS looks great. Your bank account disagrees. Here's the problem.

This is the most common trap for SME owners running their own ads. The ROAS number in Google Ads looks like 4.5x. Meta shows 3.8x. But after COGS, shipping, returns, and payment fees, you're barely breaking even. The platforms are showing you revenue metrics, not profit metrics — and every platform uses a different window to claim credit. One documented case: an eCommerce owner running at 4.5 ROAS discovered they were generating £1,200 profit on £22,000 revenue. ROAS was a lie.

features.icpFeaturePage.builtFor
features.icpFeaturePage.painPointLed
features.icpFeaturePage.beforeAfter
features.icpFeaturePage.soundFamiliar

features.icpFeaturePage.whyLookTitleLead features.icpFeaturePage.whyLookTitleHighlight

features.icpFeaturePage.whyLookSubtitle

!

features.icpFeaturePage.problemSrOnly

Platform ROAS measures revenue, not what you actually keep

!

features.icpFeaturePage.problemSrOnly

Google and Meta both claim the same conversion — your real conversion count is half what they show

!

features.icpFeaturePage.problemSrOnly

The 'learning phase' burns budget without giving you reliable data to act on

!

features.icpFeaturePage.problemSrOnly

Blended ROAS (total revenue ÷ total spend) is a much better signal but hard to calculate manually

features.icpFeaturePage.whatYouGet

features.icpFeaturePage.howHelpsTitle

ROAS Attribution applies consistent rules across your platforms so you stop being misled by each one's self-reported numbers. You see reconciled ROAS alongside each platform's reported figure so you can see exactly how much they're over-claiming—grounded in your order data where connectors allow.

features.icpFeaturePage.theShift

features.icpFeaturePage.beforeVsAfterTitleBefore features.icpFeaturePage.beforeVsAfterTitleVs features.icpFeaturePage.beforeVsAfterTitleAfter

features.icpFeaturePage.fromPainSubtitle

features.icpFeaturePage.before

Check Google: 4.2 ROAS. Check Meta: 3.8 ROAS. Calculate blended in a spreadsheet. Get a different number every time. Make a budget call based on the platform number that looks best.

features.icpFeaturePage.withAlpomi

Check Alpomi: reconciled blended ROAS of 2.1. See platform-reported vs reconciled side by side. Know exactly which channel is over-claiming. Make budget decisions on the number that matches your orders.

features.icpFeaturePage.before

Scale the campaign with the best-looking ROAS. Profit doesn't move. Wonder why.

features.icpFeaturePage.withAlpomi

Scale the campaign with the best reconciled ROAS. Profit moves. Keep scaling.

features.icpFeaturePage.theImpact

features.icpFeaturePage.outcomesTitleLead features.icpFeaturePage.outcomesTitleHighlight

Stop wasting budget on overstated ROAS

Platform ROAS is typically 40–70% overstated vs actual business performance. Now you optimise on the real number.

Consistent attribution rules across channels

No more spreadsheet reconciliation between Google and Meta reports

ROAS that matches your actual revenue

Blended ROAS calculated from actual spend and actual sales — not platform estimates

features.icpFeaturePage.wantBreakdown

features.icpFeaturePage.seeHowWorks

features.icpFeaturePage.ctaTitleLead features.icpFeaturePage.ctaTitleHighlight?

features.icpFeaturePage.ctaBody

features.icpFeaturePage.noCreditCard
features.icpFeaturePage.supportHours
ROAS Attribution for SMEs — Reconciled Cross-Channel | Alpomi